<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FileMaker Creative Agency Software &#187; Selecting Suppliers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com/category/selecting-suppliers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com</link>
	<description>Professional FileMaker Developers : Tips &#38; Experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:17:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Factors to consider when purchasing bespoke software</title>
		<link>http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com/factors-to-consider-when-purchasing-bespoke-software/</link>
		<comments>http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com/factors-to-consider-when-purchasing-bespoke-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Stuchbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Selecting Suppliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bespoke software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Planning: Do you actually need a bespoke software solution? There are lots of purpose built off-the-shelf software packages, built for a variety of businesses.  It is well worth evaluating these as well as talking to a bespoke developer. Your business comes first When evaluating off-the-shelf software, remember that the software should fit your business, not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Planning:<br />
Do you actually need a bespoke software solution?</strong><br />
There are lots of purpose built off-the-shelf software packages, built for a variety of businesses.  It is well worth evaluating these as well as talking to a bespoke developer.</p>
<p><strong>Your business comes first</strong><br />
When evaluating off-the-shelf software, remember that the software should fit your business, not the other way round.  Businesses that purchase software, then adapt their processes to fit that software are taking the wrong approach.</p>
<p><strong>What makes you think you need bespoke software</strong><br />
Consider what you’re looking to achieve.  No point in buying software just for the sake of it.  Don’t buy software just to automate a single, possibly inefficient or unnecessary process.</p>
<p><strong>Talking to a software developer:<br />
Do they have experience in the creative industry?</strong><br />
A company whose experience is in general B2B are less like to have in-depth knowledge of the creative industry, and how creative agencies operate.</p>
<p><strong>Set a realistic budget</strong><br />
Bespoke software is written solely for you, and should not be considered a cheap option.  Whilst an off-the-shelf solution may cost £500-600, it is developed for the mass market and won’t necessarily do everything you need it to do,and in the way you need to do it.</p>
<p><strong>Dedicate time to your project</strong><br />
Almost every software development company will need to spend time interviewing your staff about their experiences and expectations of your existing software and the bespoke solution being developed.  A thorough developer will gather opinions of everyone in the company, not just one person from each department.  The input of everyone is important in developing workflow processes that the software will follow.</p>
<p>The developer needs to understand what the software needs to do from the user’s perspective as well as the perspective of management.</p>
<p><strong>Be prepared to give additional input</strong><br />
Often, the development team working on your project will require further information from you as development goes on.  It should be considered a sign that good progress is being made, and that the developers place importance on getting things right first time.</p>
<p><strong>BETA testing is an important step</strong><br />
When handed a BETA version of your software, it is advisable to give copies to several members of your team, to allow them to experiment with the new software and provide valuable feedback as to the real-life usability and efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com/factors-to-consider-when-purchasing-bespoke-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Bespoke Software a &#8220;High Risk&#8221; Option?</title>
		<link>http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com/is-bespoke-software-a-high-risk-option/</link>
		<comments>http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com/is-bespoke-software-a-high-risk-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Stuchbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Selecting Suppliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buying software by Apple, Adobe or Microsoft, is probably considered by most to be a &#8220;low-risk&#8221; decision.  These are companies that are likely to be around for many years to come, and support for their products will continue to be available. The same could be said for buying software from smaller, lesser-known companies, but it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buying software by Apple, Adobe or Microsoft, is probably considered by most to be a &#8220;low-risk&#8221; decision.  These are companies that are likely to be around for many years to come, and support for their products will continue to be available.</p>
<p>The same could be said for buying software from smaller, lesser-known companies, but it requires a slightly different way of thinking.  How can software that you specify yourself be high-risk?  Unless, of course, you don&#8217;t know what you want the software to do &#8211; only that you&#8217;d know when something is &#8220;good&#8221;, because of the way it looks, or the write-ups it received in the press.  If you don&#8217;t know what you want, then the chances are that a few months after your bespoke software is implemented, you&#8217;ll find another product with some nice features that you think would be great in your solution &#8211; so you approach the developers, telling them you&#8217;ve thought of some great new features for your solution, and can they get to work straight-away.  Yes, they say, and the cost will be £X.  They also tell you that if you had included this requirement in the original specification, the additional cost would have been significantly less.</p>
<p>Of course, the original developers could not be around any more.  I&#8217;ve been approached by prospects who have had solutions developed in FileMaker, where the developers had gone out of business, moved to Afganistan (yes, really) or just &#8220;gone away&#8221;.  If you don&#8217;t know what you want your software to do, then bespoke software is likely to be a more risky purchase than pre-developed software, and the overall cost is also likely to be higher.</p>
<p>On the other hand, a company that has been around for a few years, is run by experienced, talented developers, presents you with an excellent opportunity to have software developed specifically for your business.  It is quite possible that they will have a series of &#8220;template&#8221; solutions on which to base your solution &#8211; with FileMaker developers, this is a fairly common occurrence.  So, what makes this low-risk?  You will get a feel for the company and its style of working during the conversations and meetings you have with them.  Whilst gut-feel isn&#8217;t a scientific process by any means, and business decisions should be made on solid research and understanding, gut-feel can act as an indication that you are heading in the right direction.  The proposal submitted to you, should include details of the company&#8217;s experience, both generally and specifically in your sector.  Ask for references, preferably where actual conversations take place between your and the client of the developer.  How do they handle support?  What happens if they do go out of business, or are no longer around for whatever reason?</p>
<p>Nothing will prepare you better than research and experience.  When you&#8217;ve looked at a number of solutions, and have perhaps reviewed evaluation versions, as well as carried out an analysis of your requirements and created a detailed &#8220;wish-list&#8221;, you should have a pretty good idea of what you want your software to do.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t know what you want, then bespoke software could well be a higher risk option.  On the other hand, if you&#8217;ve done your research, and have well-developed business processes, bespoke software can represent a solid investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com/is-bespoke-software-a-high-risk-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Company, Bespoke Solution or Big London Company?</title>
		<link>http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com/small-company-bespoke-solution-or-big-london-company/</link>
		<comments>http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com/small-company-bespoke-solution-or-big-london-company/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Stuchbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Selecting Suppliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bespoke software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which, if any, is &#8220;better&#8221; and why?  First, we need to define what &#8220;better&#8221; actually means, and who &#8220;better&#8221; is important to. Cost &#8211; Not the most important factor, but well worth a mention here.  Chances are that you&#8217;ll end up paying less to the smaller company, and at least some support is likely to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which, if any, is &#8220;better&#8221; and why?  First, we need to define what &#8220;better&#8221; actually means, and who &#8220;better&#8221; is important to.</p>
<p><strong>Cost</strong> &#8211; Not the most important factor, but well worth a mention here.  Chances are that you&#8217;ll end up paying less to the smaller company, and at least some support is likely to be included in the basic price you pay.  Typically the larger the company, the greater their opportunity to generate a substantial amount of ongoing income through monthly support fees.  In-fact, most CRM software resellers make the majority of their money from support contracts &amp; training &#8211; the &#8220;value added&#8221; services.  Creative agency software is different in that most developers sell directly to the client, so they make their money from the software itself.</p>
<p><strong>Flexibility of your business processes</strong> &#8211; If you&#8217;ve worked hard, and perhaps spent money refining how your business operates, you should ensure any software solution you choose can handle them.  On the other hand, software develoepd by industry experts should be able to guide your process development, if you feel that you are not perhaps as efficient and effective as you could be.</p>
<p><strong>Support &amp; customisation</strong> &#8211; Often, but not always, the bigger the company, the more personal the service.  A smaller company could not be around next year &#8211; what if the lead developer gets hit by a bus (yes, I was asked this question recently!).  It is important to ensure your investment has a future with the company you work with.  As I said above, you&#8217;ll be more likely to be paying more for an annual support contract with a larger company.</p>
<p><strong>Trust &amp; risk</strong> &#8211; You will develop  a long-term relationship with the company you select to supply your software.  Do you feel you can trust the person you&#8217;ll be dealing with?  <a href="http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com/2008/10/26/is-bespoke-software-a-high-risk-option/">Is bespoke software a &#8220;high risk&#8221; option?</a></p>
<p>Ultimately, the decision is yours to make, but don&#8217;t write either option off just because they&#8217;re the &#8220;big London company&#8221;, or just because they&#8217;re the little guys.  Size isn&#8217;t everything, especially with FileMaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creativeagencysoftware.stuchburyassociates.com/small-company-bespoke-solution-or-big-london-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
